You've grown up in a world of symbols and pacifiers.

Mocking the victim, the conspiritainment ghetto for groundlings, Freemasonry, revolution, Brave New World Revisited, symbols, shell shock, and the pointless dissection of 'events'.

By Not Sure

14 September 2025

At least 33 times a day, I notice that I’m being mocked. Call me paranoid. I see it in the hand gestures and greeting hugs of politicians, in every article dished out by the press, on the welcome sign to my town, proudly displaying the logos for every ‘secret’ society to be found within my neighborhood. If I turn on the television, the mockery quickly multiplies. The news anchor puts on a ‘grave’ face when talking about the latest school shooting, but a minute later, he’s all smiles when he reports the cute trend from Ghana: coffins shaped like fish and crabs, peacocks and airplanes. They really would be a fun way to be buried. Check it out:

Photos show Ghana’s fantasy coffins as a stylish final rest

The male news anchors still wear their Masonic uni, the tie with suit, but like everywhere else where suits are required, their pants are not so much leg coverings as shrink wrap for drumsticks. I just looked this up and I’m told that for the last couple of years, pants styles are trending to looser and more comfortable draping. I still see skinny jeans everywhere. Men who wear these fashions are being mocked, and onlookers too.

The female anchors do not wear suits, they wear tiny sandwich-board advertising apparel with bold messages such as “These are my breasts. Stare at them,” although ‘breasts’ is an archaic word unlikely to be found in their vocabularies. Is she standing? Pointing at the green screen which we assume contains weather patterns, and tropical storms building? Then maybe she’s marketing other Phat-assets.

This trend was noted nineteen years ago in the movie Idiocracy from whence I chose my name, Not Sure. As time was shown to elapse, the news anchors’ clothes became tighter and more revealing until he ended up topless, only topless we assume, because we couldn’t see below the desks where they sat.

If I should happen to sample a cable television show (and back in the day, cable was synonymous with soft-porn) chances of landing on a show I can watch in its entirety are slim to none. If the language isn’t ‘f’ this and ‘f’ that, I’ll be watching two men kissing. Not being a hater, here. I don’t particularly want to watch a man and a woman kissing. Nowadays, kissing is a gateway drug to full-frontal nudity and simulated sex.

Watch the advertisements on any show, on any channel, any time. 30 to 60 seconds of non-stop mocking.

Alan Watt talked about ‘mocking the victim’ but he was not keen on watching the mockery. Someone sent him the television series Rome. Midway through the first episode, into the fire. The series Game of Thrones. Was it the first episode or the second where the male actor with achondroplasia, a common form of dwarfism, was depicted having a threesome with two full-sized, normally proportioned females. Is it okay to say ‘normally proportioned’? Is that revealing my ‘ableism’? Would ‘cisnormative’ be better? Or, can that word only be used for gender? Help! I don’t mean to mock.

Game of Thrones? Into the wood-burning stove.

People would often send Alan discs that showed the Super Bowl half-time show or an Olympics opening ceremony and they would attach a note, “Watch this. It’s full of symbolism.” Alan wouldn’t watch those either. He asked, “What are they doing watching the Super Bowl”? I’ve heard him elaborate. “If I wanted to, I could dissect these spectacles and would see much more symbolism than is being commented on. But, why bother? We know these events are perfect opportunities for those kinds of messages and mockery.” Super Bowl and Olympics ceremonies on disc? Into the fire.

Last year, I did comment on the 33^rd Summer Olympics held in Paris, France which sparked a global controversy for its parody (mockery) of Leonardo Da Vinci’s “The Last Supper.” But even at that time, I realized that my view of that ‘ceremony’ was a little different from others who commented and wrote about it. Did “The Last Supper” attended by drag queens frolicking with children presided over by ‘Dionysus’ in blue body paint mock Christians? Absolutely. But I noticed that throughout the opening ritual, we were repeatedly shown lavish imagery celebrating the concept of REVOLUTION. Remember headless Marie Antoinette, bloody head in hand, looking down on the crowds from the Conciergerie, the historic prison where she was held, while a heavy metal band played "Ah! Ça Ira”? Ah, it’ll be fine, it’ll be fine. The revolutionary song for Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity inspired by Benjamin Franklin’s time in France as an ambassador, when he served as the Venerable Master of the French Masonic Lodge known as La Loge des Neuf Soeurs, or the Lodge of the Nine Sisters. Yes. Benjamin Franklin was a Freemason. And yes, we are mocked all the time.

Last week, I realized how disgusted I was to see the non-stop dissection of The-Event-Which-Shall-Be-Unnamed. Carnival barkers of the conspiracy circus yelling “here and here and here,” and ‘you will see side by side images of the teeth, the hands, the pinky ring.’ ‘I’ve tracked down the actor.’ ‘Look how insincere the ‘grieving’ widow is!’ they bark. I am not a conspiracy theorist, so the carnival atmosphere around events, staged or otherwise, is not that interesting. Watching it is ghoulish. It’s arrogant. Do I understand you correctly? You are an ‘investigator’? Maybe even the king or queen of the ‘didn’t happen’ ghetto? Let me follow your logic. This didn’t happen, it’s an elaborate piece of theatre, so-well crafted? You, you, have done the side by side on all the documentation…which, by your logic would have been seeded along with the staged event, but you can determine without doubt what is real and what is not?

I’ve dubbed this conspiritainment ghetto for groundlings, Murder Mystery Dinner Theatre. One more time and for the record, I saw a ritual sacrifice. Whether it was ‘real’ or ‘fake’ doesn’t matter to me. The mockery of the presentation (from all the angles I’ve grudgingly examined it) is in my face. This doesn’t surprise me and I’ve seen enough.

In this Redux from October 11, 2007 entitled “Mending Your Mind, Blending Your Kind, And You Shall All Serve as One”, Alan Watt started the blurb with a bit of a novelty song from 1966, “The Place Where The Nuts Hunt The Squirrels” by Napoleon XIV. He talked about how quickly cartoon images must move to keep children in rapt (typo in transcript is ‘wrapped’) attention. They cannot look away for more than two or three seconds or they will lose the plot of the story. I imagine nowadays, it’s moving even more quickly. Alan said it’s all psychology and it’s used on a world scale. During this talk, Alan read several excerpts from Aldous Huxley’s non-fiction book, Brave New World Revisited. Twenty-seven years after Huxley wrote Brave New World in 1931 (published 1932), he revisited that fictional work and found that the world he heralded, a scientific utopia for some/totalitarianism for the rest, would arrive much sooner than he’d predicted.

At the beginning of his talk, Alan said, “Welcome to the worldwide police state because that's what we're living in and we shouldn't be all shocked. We should really take this in a stride because we've been living in the system, a police state really for our whole lives. It's just that it's more overt now. It's more out in the open. We fail to realize the histories that led up to where we are today, mainly because it's not taught anymore at least in the lower schools.”

Indeed it is here. Data centers are popping up like mushrooms, guzzling huge quantities of water. Your AI chat buddy may hallucinate like a thirsty man in the desert seeing an oasis, but don’t fear, Grok is drinking plenty of water. Any query about water shortages will return a healthy handful of hand-wringing stories from the local to the global level. Klaus Schwab retired from the World Economic Forum, Peter Brabeck-Letmathe is the Chairman ad interim of WEF, and a foundation member and Board of Trustees member of the WEF. As chairman emeritus, former chairman and CEO of Nestlé he famously said that water is not a human right, but a commodity which should be treated as such and privatized.

The right to water versus the CEO of Nestle

But please don’t look into that or any number of stories that might affect you, which you could study and educate others about. It is not nearly so ‘audience immersive’ as Murder-Mystery-Dinner-Theatre.

Alan Watt read another excerpt from Brave New World Revisited, “He's talking about symbols here. Now symbols are all around you. You've grown up in a world of symbols. Symbols comprise a language, a language that the subconscious understands.”

Then Alan read a section where Huxley was discussing shell shock, battle fatigue, and an individual’s limit of endurance.

Alan: This is a tremendous subject to the people who run the world, remember, because they must know how everyone ticks and how to break you, how to condition you so you'll love big brother eventually. You'll love the master.

"Most men reach their limit after about thirty days of more or less continuous stress under the conditions of modern combat. The more than averagely susceptible succumb in only fifteen days. The more than averagely tough can resist for forty-five or fifty days. Strong or weak, in the long run all of these break down. All, that is to say, of those who are initially sane."

Alan: Isn't this interesting, this part?

“For, ironically enough, the only people who can hold up indefinitely under the stress of modern war are psychotics. Individual insanity is immune to the consequences of collective insanity.”

Alan: Isn't this amazing? It's incredibly ancient, it’s Babylonian in its understanding of the human mind, because he admits it right in the open. It's even in the Talmud I think.

“Individual insanity is immune to the consequences of collective insanity.”

I’m sure Alan had a lot of fun adding Napoleon XIV’s novelty song at the beginning of the blurb. “They're trying to drive me sane, hehe.” According to research available to Aldous Huxley, individual insanity (psychosis) is immune to the consequences of collective insanity, so by all means do not let them drive you sane, hehe. But psychosis is not the ideal fix. Better to remove yourself from the collective. Acknowledge you’ve been traumatized by symbolism your whole life, weaned, I ween, on spectacle.

The first section of Alan Watt’s Cutting Through volume one, “The Hermaphroditic (Androgynous) Agenda” is about symbols/cymbals, and Alan gives us examples of how symbols are used to control us. This is an ancient art form from a deviant priesthood, and knowledge of how to apply it is passed down through time, perfecting itself.

Lately I’ve been talking about living without hope. Maybe a better way to say it is, consider outgrowing the pacifier, which often comes shaped like an event. Baby loves pacifiers. Keep baby quiet and happy. Suck on a presidential campaign or a school shooting or a church picnic or an invasion of alien refugees or a Super Bowl halftime show. Every pacifier has a pretty color to catch baby’s eye.

Alan wrote, “Sheep are fleeced. They are Mutt-On…Each ‘flock’ follows their master, thinking birth-place and culture has a reserved a place in Paradise. This work is for the individual spirit, for those who know that this universe and this world was made by something greater and more wonderful than human minds could ever dream of. The simplicity of accepting this is the beginning of personal freedom. It is the beginning of LIFE. To LIVE instead of EXIST is a miracle in itself. Personal experience must be the guide, for everyone knows what is right or wrong. We are not animals. We have an intellect which makes us far more dangerous than any animal…”

Sucking on the pacifier of conspiritainment is not living.

© Not Sure